<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media &#8211; What are we doing this for?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://herbsawyer.com/2007/10/02/social-media-what-are-we-doing-this-for/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://herbsawyer.com/2007/10/02/social-media-what-are-we-doing-this-for/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:34:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Trenn</title>
		<link>http://herbsawyer.com/2007/10/02/social-media-what-are-we-doing-this-for/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Trenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://herbsawyer.com/?p=36#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Herb

For a while now I&#039;ve been saying that social media is overhyped, but not overrated.  It&#039;s not for every client.  

The new technologies that keep on popping up may be &#039;cool&#039; but may also have little or no extensive business appeal.  It&#039;s a matter of tapping into the right ones for the right reasons.

I want to blog about this at www.marketingconversation.com.  Good blog here, Herb.  I&#039;ll be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herb</p>
<p>For a while now I&#8217;ve been saying that social media is overhyped, but not overrated.  It&#8217;s not for every client.  </p>
<p>The new technologies that keep on popping up may be &#8216;cool&#8217; but may also have little or no extensive business appeal.  It&#8217;s a matter of tapping into the right ones for the right reasons.</p>
<p>I want to blog about this at <a href="http://www.marketingconversation.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketingconversation.com</a>.  Good blog here, Herb.  I&#8217;ll be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Snyder</title>
		<link>http://herbsawyer.com/2007/10/02/social-media-what-are-we-doing-this-for/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://herbsawyer.com/?p=36#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Many good points, Herb. I&#039;ve spent a fair amount of time wondering if brands entering into social media spaces (and I mean entering as participants not advertisers) is as valuable as some think it is. There&#039;s a bit of &quot;everybody else is doing Web 2.0/MySpace/Facebook, we better do it too.&quot; The need may be there, but &quot;everybody else is doing it&quot; is a panic mode that leads to non-strategic uses.&quot; 
I know that as a user (or over users, as the case may be), I could care less about my favorite brand being online. I use social media to keep up with (and make) friends and colleagues. A secondary use for me would be nonprofits. I find it&#039;s a great way to connect with causes, take action, and make donations. I&#039;m not claiming to be a typical users, but that&#039;s where it ends for me.

Where I have seen social media work is when execs speak straight to consumers. I think of Stony Field&#039;s president starting a blog that (at least according to them) drove a lot of traffic to their website. As they are a small company creating organic dairy products, that personal relationship really has the potential to build brand equity. I also think of Jet Blue&#039;s CEO (it was the CEO, wasn&#039;t it) apologizing on YouTube. 

I&#039;ve also seen blogging work very effectively in B2B situations where visitors are looking for advice rather than hard sales (which, presumably at least, translates into sales down the road).

And I&#039;ve seen lots of nonprofits use MySpace, Facebook, and blogs to raise money, but again, that&#039;s organizing people around a cause, not a product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many good points, Herb. I&#8217;ve spent a fair amount of time wondering if brands entering into social media spaces (and I mean entering as participants not advertisers) is as valuable as some think it is. There&#8217;s a bit of &#8220;everybody else is doing Web 2.0/MySpace/Facebook, we better do it too.&#8221; The need may be there, but &#8220;everybody else is doing it&#8221; is a panic mode that leads to non-strategic uses.&#8221;<br />
I know that as a user (or over users, as the case may be), I could care less about my favorite brand being online. I use social media to keep up with (and make) friends and colleagues. A secondary use for me would be nonprofits. I find it&#8217;s a great way to connect with causes, take action, and make donations. I&#8217;m not claiming to be a typical users, but that&#8217;s where it ends for me.</p>
<p>Where I have seen social media work is when execs speak straight to consumers. I think of Stony Field&#8217;s president starting a blog that (at least according to them) drove a lot of traffic to their website. As they are a small company creating organic dairy products, that personal relationship really has the potential to build brand equity. I also think of Jet Blue&#8217;s CEO (it was the CEO, wasn&#8217;t it) apologizing on YouTube. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also seen blogging work very effectively in B2B situations where visitors are looking for advice rather than hard sales (which, presumably at least, translates into sales down the road).</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve seen lots of nonprofits use MySpace, Facebook, and blogs to raise money, but again, that&#8217;s organizing people around a cause, not a product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
